You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Background’ category.

“The effects of a port in Sonora, Mexico would be an overall benefit to the Mexican and US economies with the state of Arizona seeing a great amount of potential revenues if chosen as a distribution hub for the goods. However, the public perception of such development may be a hindrance as politicians seek to promote the economic advantages while the “not in my backyard” attitudes of their constituents affect their reelection chances. In light of NAFTA and the need for economic stimulus by any means, it is my belief that Arizona will become a major transportation hub in the future with a direct link to the new ports in Sonora.”

more via SanTan Marketing Professionals: Intermodal Transportation Case Study.

Transportation in the US

Blog About Hydraulic Truck Cranes For Sale » Dot Truck Inspections.

Here you will find the Truck program process since 1995.

CNN regarding Mexican trucks, posted october 27, 2006

Two of NAFTA provisions are strongly debated the strictness of the rules of origin, and the cross-border trucks. NAFTA established a schedule to opened national borders to trucks. In the case of the US, by December 17, 1995 the border states should be opened for Mexican trucks, and by January 1, 2000 all of the US and Canada. Nevertheless, due to previous financial crisis Mexican trucks were very old, and strong concerns on safety were placed by the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT). The US DOT decided that until safety concerns were resolved Mexican trucks would only be able to operate in what is called commercial zones (Frittelli 1).

Safety concerns were sustained by the 45% of inspected Mexican trucks that were declared dangerous by the US DOT in 1996. Several other concerns such as American job loss, and low Mexican drivers requirements make the trucking provision to be postponed. Mexico formally protested in 1998 using the methods of dispute settlements established in NAFTA. The arbitration panel resolved that the US was in breach of the legal obligations contracted under NAFTA, thus the concerns of the safety of the trucks were not enough to relieve the obligation. President Bush told U.S. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to start accepting Mexican applications by 2001, for long-haul operations. Nonetheless, Congress passed the FY2002 Department of Transportation Appropriations Act (P.L. 107-87) requiring 22 preconditions for Mexican trucks to be allowed to operate beyond the commercial zone (Frittelli 1).

The Secretary of Transportation declared in November 2002 that all the 22 preconditions of FY2002 Appropriations Act were already in placed by the FMCSA. Therefore, the FMCSA was prepared to start processing applications. Despite that, in January 2003 the Ninth Circuit of Appeals delayed the implementation of the program, due to the Public Citizen v. Department of Transportation case until an environmental impact statement was made under the Clean Air Act, and the National Environment Policy Act. The case reached the Supreme Court, who reversed the Appeals decision in June 2004 (Frittelli 2).

Border Trucks

Border Trucks

However, the U.S. DOT Inspector General announced in January 2005 that the FMCSA was only able to comply with only 8 of the 22 requirements of the FY2002 Appropriations Act. It was not until February 2007 that requirements were met. Therefore, U.S. and Mexican Secretaries of Transportation started a demonstration project to begin implementation of NAFTA trucking provisions. To prove that Mexico-based motor carriers were able to comply with all American regulations, 100 companies of each country will be authorized to make long-haul trips in each other country. The participants would be heavily monitored to evaluate the program, including official GPS to address cabotage concerns (Frittelli 3).

All the same, with the approval of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans’ Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (P.L. 110-28, section 6901) on May 2007, Congress added new requirements to the demonstration project. In September 2007, the new requirements were complied by the DOT and the demonstration project begun (Frittelli 3).

Still, with the FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 110-161) in December 2007, Congress forbid the use of funds for the cross-border trucking program. Bush administration claimed that the as the program had started before the passage of the law, the program can continue. The unions and environmentalist groups filed suit under the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, which oral arguments were held in February 2008, although the decision is still pending. Because of the low participation by carriers the demonstration project was extended for two more years in August 2008 (Frittelli 4).

Nevertheless with the approbation of the FY2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act (P.L. 111-8) in May 2009, Congress mandated the immediate termination of the demonstration project. In retaliation, on March 2009, Mexico approved an increased in tariffs on 90 US products with an estimated value of 2.4 billion dollars. These duties imposed in consumer goods range from a 45% on fresh onions to 10% in toilet paper. Since the North American Summit in August 2009 negotiations are being held to resolve this issue (Alexander n.p.; Organo 50-51; “Joint” n.p.)

This video shows protesters against Mexican trucks, posted February 20, 2008

This is the information attached to the video, you can find it in youtube by double-clicking on the video:

SENATE EXPECTED TO VOTE ON MEXICAN TRUCK PROGRAM TODAY

Vote Follows Reports of Mexican Truck Explosion That Killed 34 People, Injured 150

Teamsters General President Jim Hoffa urged the Senate to block funding for the Bush administration’s illegal Mexican truck program.

Hoffa said the program threatens highway safety and national security. The danger posed by trucks from Mexico was made clear by the truck explosion that killed at least 34 people and injured 150 in Northern Mexico on Sunday.

A vote to block funding for the pilot program is expected to occur in the Senate on the afternoon of Tuesday, Sept. 11.

“Today is the sixth anniversary of the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil,” Hoffa said. “I don’t see how any patriotic American could vote to allow these dangerous trucks to cross our borders and travel freely throughout our country.”

“We don’t know who’s driving these trucks and we don’t know what they’re carrying,” Hoffa said. “Weapons that could be used in a terrorist attack might be in the backs of these trucks.”

The history of the trucking dispute of the US with Mexico can be traced within all the trade disputes between these two neighbors. The trade with Mexico was very small from the 1930s to middle the 1980s due to trade protectionist policies of Mexico. Mexico was making big efforts to be independent, it started by establishing all sort of restrictions against foreign investments, and trades. Mexico was trying to reinforce their industrial capacity, as well as the government was controlling more and more resources such as mining, or oil. Nevertheless, this strategy did not give the expected results, and in the 1980s a harsh inflation make the standard of living to decline rapidly (Villarreal 1, NAFTA).

In 1982 Mexico declared the inability to pay the country enormous debt. Mexico’s President, Miguel de la Madrid, stepped in and nationalized Mexico’s banks, although privatizing many state industries and making substantial movements towards trade liberalization as the only solution to Mexico economy. This background is important because it established the state of Mexico economy when they were seeking a free trade alliance with the US. The strategy changed from a strict protectionism to a non-stop openness of Mexico’s market, although Mexico economy was extremely poor, as well as terrible low education levels (Villarreal 2, NAFTA).

Even though Mexico low economic level at that time it managed to close ties with the US. In 1986 the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was signed to assured future free trade measures between both countries. The next year, in 1987 they both agreed on the Framework of Principles and Procedures for Consultation Regarding Trade and Investment Relations, which become the first legal framework to monitor trade relations. Following, in October 1989 a second agreement was reach: The Understanding Regarding Trade and Investment Facilitation Talks, which amplifies the previous one. A free trade trajectory that was clear to President Carlos Salinas de Gortari of Mexico when he approached President George H. W. Bush in 1990 to start negotiating what will become the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1993. NAFTA entered into effect in January 1994 (Villarreal 2, NAFTA).

RSS Mexico Trucker

  • Supreme Court rejects OOIDA challenge to ELD mandate June 12, 2017
    The U.S. Supreme Court today rejected OOIDA’s lawsuit challenging the federal government’s rule mandating the use of electronic logging devices on most trucks, leaving in place the Dec. 18 deadline for carriers to put them into use. OOIDA claimed the mandate violated drivers’ Constitutional protections against warrantless searches and seizures and that the r […]
    admin@mexicotrucker.com (PM Corn)
  • Hours of Service Revisions for Mexican Truckers coming in second Half of 2017 April 20, 2017
    The private sector and federal authorities are preparing to unveil in  second half of this year, new Hours of Service standards for operators of federal motor transportation services, which will regulate the number of hours driving and mandatory rest times. Felipe de Javier Peña, Vice-President of the Transport Commission of Concamin, reported that the measu […]
    admin@mexicotrucker.com (PM Corn)
June 2017
M T W T F S S
« Dec    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Archive

Categories